What was the famous line in My Cousin Vinny?
My Cousin Vinny Quotes Bill Gambini: No Stan, I’m being booked for murder, you’re being booked for accessory to murder. Vincent La Guardia Gambini: How many times have you said spontaneous is romantic? Mona Lisa Vito: A burp is spontaneous. A burp is not romantic.
Did you say two Yutes?
Judge Chamberlain Haller : Uh… did you say ‘yutes’? Vinny Gambini : Yeah, two yutes. Vinny Gambini : Two YOUTHS.
How long does it take to make grits My Cousin Vinny?
I take pride in my grits. Gambini: So, Mr. Tipton, how could it take you five minutes to cook your grits, when it takes the entire grit-eating world 20 minutes.
Who is Vincent Gambini?
Vincent Gambini is a fictional character in the 1992 American comedy film My Cousin Vinny. In the film, after recently becoming a lawyer, he has to defend his cousin Billy in an Alabama trial after Billy and his friends are falsely accused of murder. He was portrayed by Joe Pesci.
Does the defense’s case hold water Meaning?
Meaning: When you say that something does or does not ‘hold water’, it means that the point of view or argument put forward is or is not sound, strong or logical.
How long does it take Tipton to cook grits?
Gambini: So, Mr. Tipton, how could it take you five minutes to cook your grits, when it takes the entire grit-eating world 20 minutes. Mr. Tipton: I don’t know.
Why do young trial lawyers need to Watch my Cousin Vinny?
Young trial lawyers without much trial experience owe it to themselves to watch My Cousin Vinny, for the reasons raised by Professor Alberto Bernabe:
Are there any bad guys in my Cousin Vinny?
In Abnormal Use’s interview with the director, Jonathan Lynn, Lynn notes one of the aspects of My Cousin Vinny that struck me: [T]here aren’t any bad guys in the film. Most films seem to have a corrupt judge or a corrupt prosecutor or there’s somebody who’s a bad guy. There are no bad guys in Vinny . . . .
Why do trial lawyers need to watch magic grits?
Every trial lawyer also swells with pride watching the “magic grits” cross examination, recalling their own times when they set up a key witness for the other side to admit indisputable facts, concluding the cross-examination with an unrelenting demand that the witness admit to the court that they’re no longer confident about their testimony.