What did the Supreme Court rule in the Bakke case?
Bakke (1978), the Supreme Court ruled that a university’s use of racial “quotas” in its admissions process was unconstitutional, but a school’s use of “affirmative action” to accept more minority applicants was constitutional in some circumstances.
What was the Bakke case quizlet?
Bakke , the Supreme Court ruled that a university’s use of racial quotas in its admissions process was unlawful, but a school’s use of “affirmative action” to accept more outvoted candidates was constitutional in some circumstances.
Why did Bakke win his case?
Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978), was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. However, the court ruled that specific racial quotas, such as the 16 out of 100 seats set aside for minority students by the University of California, Davis School of Medicine, were impermissible.
What was the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Roe v Wade case of 1973?
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States protects a pregnant woman’s liberty to choose to have an abortion without excessive government restriction.
What did Bakke say?
Bakke decision, formally Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, ruling in which, on June 28, 1978, the U.S. Supreme Court declared affirmative action constitutional but invalidated the use of racial quotas.
What was the decision of the US Supreme Court in the case Korematsu v United States quizlet?
A US Supreme Court Case in late 1944 in which the Court declared that the internment of Japanese Americans was justified to protect national security.
What is the likely effect of the court’s ruling in the Bakke case?
According to the quote, what is the likely effect of the Court’s ruling in the Bakke case? Colleges can consider race but cannot use strict racial quotas in admission practices.
How did the decision in Regents of the University of California v Bakke Supreme Court decision affect affirmative action programs in the United States?
The case Regents of the University of California v. Bakke changed the affirmative action programs in the US because the US Supreme Court declared that affirmative actions were constitutional, but the use of racial quotas was invalidated.
What resulted from the Supreme Court’s ruling in Miranda v Arizona 1966 )?
In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects, prior to police questioning, must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination.